{"id":537,"date":"2017-12-06T09:00:35","date_gmt":"2017-12-06T08:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ata-divisions.org\/SLD\/?p=537"},"modified":"2017-12-04T21:32:38","modified_gmt":"2017-12-04T20:32:38","slug":"sld-practice-group-in-numbers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ata-divisions.org\/SLD\/sld-practice-group-in-numbers\/","title":{"rendered":"SLD Practice Group in Numbers"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Maria Guzenko<\/p>\n

The Slavic Languages Division exam practice group is entering its second year. The background and activities of the group were covered in detail in our SlavFile<\/em> article<\/a> and a subsequent ATA Chronicle<\/em> column<\/a>. Now is a good time to report on how the group is doing.<\/p>\n

To this end, the administrators of the group (currently Eugenia Tietz-Sokolskaya and Maria Guzenko) conducted a brief survey among group participants in late summer of 2017. We received responses from 21 group members. Although our sample was too small to be talking about any trends, we thought it may be interesting to share some numbers. The respondents had the option to skip questions, so some of our numbers will not add up to 21.<\/p>\n

Participant Statistics<\/h2>\n

Of all respondents, 15 (71.4%) reported working in the English to Russian pair, 10 (47.6%) in Russian to English, 2 (9.5%) in English to Ukrainian, and 1 (4.8%) in Ukrainian to English, Polish to English, and French to English, each. Respondents had the option of choosing more than one combination.<\/p>\n

Most participants (90%) were located in the United States, with one person located in Poland and Ukraine each. English to Russian was the most popular language combination for practice (14 respondents), followed by Russian to English (11), English to Ukrainian (2), Polish to English (1), and English to Polish (1). Unfortunately, none of the respondents reported joining the practice group in the Ukrainian to English, Croatian to English, and English to Croatian directions.<\/p>\n

\"Bar<\/p>\n

Experience with ATA Exams<\/h2>\n

Nine respondents (42.9%) had taken a certification exam before joining the practice group. Of those respondents, 4 did so in the English to Russian combination, 3 in Russian to English, 1 in Polish to English, and 1 in English to Ukrainian. Six of the participants who had taken the exam reported failing, while 2 reported passing.<\/p>\n

\"Pie<\/p>\n

Most of the respondents (66.7%) were planning to take the exam in the next year, with only 19% not planning to, and 14.3% undecided. The combinations in which candidates planned to take the exam were as follows: 12 English to Russian, 6 Russian to English, 1 Ukrainian to English, and 1 English to Ukrainian.<\/p>\n

Thirteen (61.9%) of all participants reported taking the official ATA practice test, 8 in the English to Russian direction, 4 in Russian to English, and 1 in Polish to English.<\/p>\n

\"Bar<\/p>\n

By the time the survey was distributed, 33.3% (7) of the participants had taken the certification exam. The most popular exam directions were English to Russian (3), Russian to English (2), Ukrainian to English (1), and Polish to English (1). 57.1% (4) reported failing, and 28.6 % (2) reported passing, with the remaining respondent waiting for their result. Since then, we have heard from at least three more participants that they had passed.<\/p>\n

Continued Engagement<\/h2>\n

\"Pie<\/h2>\n

Of all participants, 23.8% reported participating in the group weekly, 28.6% monthly, 19% occasionally, and 28.6% had ceased to participate in the group\u2019s activities. Of those no longer actively participating, 50% said they planned to return to the group in the future, 33.3% answered \u201cmaybe,\u201d and 16.7% (1 person) was not planning to resume participating.<\/p>\n

Practice Group Rankings<\/h2>\n

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), the average rankings for the following categories were:<\/p>\n